Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use lib instead of libs for require path #321

Closed
trans opened this issue Dec 21, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2788
Closed

Use lib instead of libs for require path #321

trans opened this issue Dec 21, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2788

Comments

@trans
Copy link

trans commented Dec 21, 2014

It would be better to use lib (singular) rather than libs (plural) for a few reasons.

  1. The Unix standard name for such directory is lib. Probably every developer knows this.
  2. The plural is superfluous, it doesn't really provide any addition semantic information.
  3. Plurals tend to be used inconsistently in projects, e.g. doc or docs, tests or test.

For these reasons it would be better to stick with more abbreviated singular lib.

@miketheman
Copy link
Contributor

#triage
This issue has moved from draft to accepted recently. The implementation appears to be underway in related issues.

@asterite
Copy link
Member

Yes, this depends on #2788, which in turns depends on shards adopting this new logic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants