Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement properties via generics (avoid boxing/unboxing) #23

Open
wilhelmberg opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Implement properties via generics (avoid boxing/unboxing) #23

wilhelmberg opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@wilhelmberg

Comments

@wilhelmberg
Copy link
Contributor

wilhelmberg commented Jan 12, 2017 •
edited
Loading

As property values can have different types they are currently implemented as Dictionary<string, object>.

Find an implementation to avoid boxing/unboxing.
@wilhelmberg wilhelmberg self-assigned this Jan 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wilhelmberg wilhelmberg

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wilhelmberg