You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think most of the time people will create trees with the same node class, and with the same data type as well. I can work on a PR if you think this is a good idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
that would be an improvement, we can experiment with it. Let's see where it takes us.
We need have tests and support for the TypedTree as well.
And also deal with Python version 3.8+ somehow, I think.
Hi, thanks for this library. I'm experimenting with it to represent a tree like structure and seems to fit well.
I think it would be nice to make use of generics for the
Node
andTree
class, something like:I think most of the time people will create trees with the same node class, and with the same data type as well. I can work on a PR if you think this is a good idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: