Use WKT for spatial coverage

[pieterprovoost]

The format for spatial coverage is not really restricted at the moment, suggest to use WKT.

[marc-portier]

identifiers (marineregions or NVS-C19) might be available too?
allow both? split collumns? or prefix in some way to make clear?

[pieterprovoost]

Yes, this would be in addition to MRGIDs. The current description says:

Required: lat, long bounding box; OR lat, long point; OR lat, long list; OR link to a geographical shape file. Also please provide a Marine Region MRGID (https://www.marineregions.org/gazetteer.php?p=search). Ideally use decimal for lat, long, to as many significant digits that provides the spatial resolution your project requires). Don't forget to also add the projection you're using (recommended is WGS84) if coordinates are given

[kmexter]

@pieterprovoost the column description in the "latest version" of the googlesheet (see readme for this repo for the link) has been updated, but I need some examples of bounding boxes, can you add that please?
FYI for the example datasets in there we have the following - perhaps you could reformat these into how they should be given and add those to the googlesheet?
VLIZdataset 1
0.7481867
3.96861133
52.11949487
50.1015429
VLIZdataset2
W 0.74816 E 3.96861 N 52.11949 S 50.10156
(these are the Eurobis bounding boxes)

I have added marine regions - @marc-portier what do you and @pieterprovoost think is the best way to gather both a BB and a MR in the same column - different columns, or always have MR as a URL and BB as something else formatted so we can recognise the different elements?

[pieterprovoost]

@kmexter In the version I was working in this was updated to:

Enter the spatial coverage as WKT (which can cover polygons, points, curves, see https://wktmap.com/?8f50dfaa for an example) OR a list of Marine Region MRGIDs (https://www.marineregions.org/gazetteer.php?p=search), whichever is more relevant to your project. Use +/-decimal for lat, long, to as many significant digits that provides the spatial resolution your project requires. Don't forget to also add the projection you're using (recommended is WGS84). Multiple values should be ";" separated.

The example for your polygon would be: https://wktmap.com/?31f5e684

[kmexter]

OK. So we stick with EITHER bb OR MR? As it will be a pain to deal with both, no?
Small thing, but I was wondering about asking for ";" separator vs ",". I think this is for @marc-portier to answer - for now I will stick to not "," as it is more normal

[pieterprovoost]

If it's acceptable to have an extra column, then yes separate columns will be easier to parse. In any case I think we need to offer both options (WKT string or MRGIDs).

[kmexter]

have updated the googlesheet - WDYT?