You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for BaSiC which generally works awesome. However we sometimes find issues when processing fluorescence images from plates with sparse cells. I'm under the impression that there are two potential pitfalls for BaSiC:
If the cells are sparse and small, the imresize() may not capture them at all? It will use nearest neighbor, as far as I could see, so it may just happen to not grasp the relevant foreground pixels?
The model from BaSiC is sometimes quite irregular, with strong local variations, i.e. in cases of dirt or sparse cells. I think it would help to regularize more strongly, but I do not know how to sensibly do that in the code. Actually I am often under the impression that a resolution of 32x32 instead of 128x128 would be sufficient, but I do not feel comfortable to change such integral settings of the method. Do you have recommendations for regularization of the model?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for BaSiC which generally works awesome. However we sometimes find issues when processing fluorescence images from plates with sparse cells. I'm under the impression that there are two potential pitfalls for BaSiC:
imresize()
may not capture them at all? It will use nearest neighbor, as far as I could see, so it may just happen to not grasp the relevant foreground pixels?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: