-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spike: Twitter advanced search documentation updates #399
Comments
@teslashibe updated the advance search option from Twitter and the acceptance criteria, please review the list of advance search options and let me know if this looks correct or we should remove some. |
@giovaroma this looks fantastic - let move forward with this. I have added this to a release in the roadmap here: masa-finance/roadmap#2 (cc @mudler @H34D @Luka-Loncar) I changed this to "In review" on product board added this to no-status in the protocol board and it can be groomed on Monday |
Wonderful, moving tickets down the pipeline @teslashibe |
potentially a duplicate of #362 ? |
Exact match documentation depends on #351 |
Exact match and advanced search should be tested first. @nolanjacobson |
This has been done and QA'd, follow-up #459 |
Problem
Users of the Twitter endpoint want more granular search capabilities. Our API supports advanced search this but its not documented. Advanced search queries can be constructed here: https://x.com/search-advanced?lang=en
We currently do not document examples of advanced search in the swagger documentation or developer documentation so people understand the full functionality of the twitter search API.
Here are some examples of advanced search queries:
These developer documentation can be found here: https://help.x.com/en/using-x/x-advanced-search
Customer feedback
https://masafinance.slack.com/archives/C078JCDS81E/p1719870998918199
https://masafinance.slack.com/archives/C073K1YP8CR/p1717494858189539
Acceptance criteria:
Documentation Structure:
Search Type Documentation:
Testing:
Advance search to support:
Possible solutions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: