We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The Document and the QueryHit are two differnet classes. One is about storing the data, the other is, maybe, about the search results.
Currently the document has the methods getTitle, getDescription and getUrl. Which I think would better belong to QueryHit.
getTitle
getDescription
getUrl
QueryHit
But having hard-methods in QueryHit is quite limiting to extensiblility, so they should instead be registered dynamic fields.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The Document and the QueryHit are two differnet classes. One is about storing the data, the other is, maybe, about the search results.
Currently the document has the methods
getTitle
,getDescription
andgetUrl
. Which I think would better belong toQueryHit
.But having hard-methods in
QueryHit
is quite limiting to extensiblility, so they should instead be registered dynamic fields.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: