You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thanks for providing pretrained models and the code for M3Gnet. I was trying to recover the M3Gnet predictions from MatBench training for submitting your results to https://github.com/materialsproject/matbench. I have this code below but I could not recover the exact values reported in the paper (although very close).
Can you help me? Are there some differences or problems in conversion I did not found out?
Dear m3gnet developers,
thanks for providing pretrained models and the code for M3Gnet. I was trying to recover the M3Gnet predictions from MatBench training for submitting your results to https://github.com/materialsproject/matbench. I have this code below but I could not recover the exact values reported in the paper (although very close).
Can you help me? Are there some differences or problems in conversion I did not found out?
With this script I got:
matbench_mp_e_form 19.48588313396765 0.19626422885988018
matbench_mp_gap 194.9911496262826 6.773441655230544
matbench_mp_is_metal 0.9397143291057087 0.0028206924210185786
matbench_perovskites 32.99242523617427 1.3762758094915537
matbench_log_kvrh 0.07380833213983187 0.010354237232502703
matbench_log_gvrh 0.09913490092743893 0.011390576803829782
matbench_dielectric 0.3168320033220523 0.06471518661133054
matbench_phonons 34.112623907973145 4.56153709897016
matbench_jdft2d 50.06711240004724 11.892898998285041
only log_kvrh, log_gvrh and gap seems worse than supposed to.
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: