Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability for servers (not users) to join rooms over federation (SPEC-300) #137

Open
matrixbot opened this issue Dec 10, 2015 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
A-S2S Server-to-Server API (federation) feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration p4

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member

matrixbot commented Dec 10, 2015

Can't find the bug for this so opening one just in case it's never been filed.

There are many places we've seen where it could be useful for servers to participate in a room's federation even if none of their users are joined to the room:

(Imported from https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-300)

(Reported by @ara4n)

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Jira watchers: @ara4n @richvdh

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

matrixbot commented Dec 10, 2015

Links exported from Jira:

relates to https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/648
relates to matrix-org/synapse#1559

@matrixbot matrixbot added the p4 label Oct 28, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Ability for servers (not users) to join rooms over federation Ability for servers (not users) to join rooms over federation (SPEC-300) Oct 31, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot added the feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration label Nov 7, 2016
@turt2live turt2live added the A-S2S Server-to-Server API (federation) label Jul 10, 2018
@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented Apr 21, 2019

@richvdh richvdh transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals Mar 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-S2S Server-to-Server API (federation) feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration p4
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants