forked from rust-lang/rust
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Rollup merge of rust-lang#95483 - golddranks:improve_float_docs, r=jo…
…shtriplett Improve floating point documentation This is my attempt to improve/solve rust-lang#95468 and rust-lang#73328 . Added/refined explanations: - Refine the "NaN as a special value" top level explanation of f32 - Refine `const NAN` docstring: add an explanation about there being multitude of NaN bitpatterns and disclaimer about the portability/stability guarantees. - Refine `fn is_sign_positive` and `fn is_sign_negative` docstrings: add disclaimer about the sign bit of NaNs. - Refine `fn min` and `fn max` docstrings: explain the semantics and their relationship to the standard and libm better. - Refine `fn trunc` docstrings: explain the semantics slightly more. - Refine `fn powi` docstrings: add disclaimer that the rounding behaviour might be different from `powf`. - Refine `fn copysign` docstrings: add disclaimer about payloads of NaNs. - Refine `minimum` and `maximum`: add disclaimer that "propagating NaN" doesn't mean that propagating the NaN bit patterns is guaranteed. - Refine `max` and `min` docstrings: add "ignoring NaN" to bring the one-row explanation to parity with `minimum` and `maximum`. Cosmetic changes: - Reword `NaN` and `NAN` as plain "NaN", unless they refer to the specific `const NAN`. - Reword "a number" to `self` in function docstrings to clarify. - Remove "Returns NAN if the number is NAN" from `abs`, as this is told to be the default behavior in the top explanation.
- Loading branch information
Showing
6 changed files
with
182 additions
and
68 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.