Planimetrics 2022: Should we review split buildings?

[mattyschell]

In the delivered sample data we have ~20 buildings where, based on the capture rules, the contractor decided to split an existing building.

Decide whether we should review these. Probably this review is not necessary and these are artifacts from the process. The contractor starts with imagery, digitizes footprints, and then combines with existing data. If the process was reversed you would not have these splits.

Let's drop some examples below here.

[mattyschell]

BIN - 4199672
95-02 121 STREET Queens
95-04 121 STREET Queens

4 tax lots, fishy

[mattyschell]

BIN - 4583248
111-49 120 STREET Queens

A garage that is actually 2 structures. I don't think we care? Add no garages to the query till someone suggests otherwise

[mattyschell]

The subject matter experts agree that these should be reviewed. However garages should be excluded from the review.

Consider adding tox lots to the universe query, 6 on the list here:

https://github.com/mattyschell/geodatabase-buildings/blob/main/doc/planimetrics.md

Also consider ordering by last modified date. A recently edited building is more likely to be good because someone reviewed the relevant data sources and did not think it necessary to split.

[mattyschell]

We tried but the planimetrics delivery was too erratic to do much.

see CityOfNewYork/nyc-planimetrics#58