Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong ownership for some files in the docker image #56

Open
vpag opened this issue May 28, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Wrong ownership for some files in the docker image #56

vpag opened this issue May 28, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug bug Effort - Low Effort - Low Frequency - EveryTime Frequency - EveryTime Priority - Now Priority - Now Reach - Most Reach - Most Severity - S2 Severity - S2

Comments

@vpag
Copy link

vpag commented May 28, 2023

Since that version of memgraph-platform image

memgraph/memgraph-platform        4175e85fe222   7 weeks ago    4.27GB

I cannot pull new images with userns-remap enabled for my docker-daemon (there is a need to Isolate containers with a user namespace):

docker.io/library/ubuntu:latest
latest: Pulling from memgraph/memgraph-platform
918547b94326: Already exists 
f815fa9e14e8: Pull complete 
6b482b77e73b: Pull complete 
88cf2268c327: Pull complete 
8732ff3dcc30: Extracting [==================================================>]  203.1MB/203.1MB
577cf9a29f74: Download complete 
70c869c750eb: Download complete 
c24bc4875209: Download complete 
085adf99c4c7: Download complete 
bf3ca2dacec8: Download complete 
30606883fc65: Download complete 
785edee73992: Download complete 
b439c9539bc9: Download complete 
2e342eec9491: Download complete 
64b9a94c8a58: Download complete 
78859b243ab6: Download complete 
07e024a86f7b: Download complete 
4f4fb700ef54: Download complete 
failed to register layer: Container ID 718322462 cannot be mapped to a host ID

Indeed, It's unlikely for 718322462 to be within ID ranges set in /etc/subuid and /etc/subgid files, whenever someone configures userns-remap. I tried to extend them and perform such search for files that have too high uid/gid:

$ docker run --rm -it memgraph/memgraph-platform bash

root@fa41dca61e14:/# find / \( -type f -or -type d \) -exec \
    bash -c '[ $(expr $(stat -c "%u + %g" "$0") ) -ge 131069 ] && ls -dln "$0"' {} \;

-rw-r--r-- 1 718322462 454177323 1518 May 18 16:04 /lab/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/LICENSE.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 718322462 454177323 26 May 18 16:04 /lab/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/.npmignore
-rw-r--r-- 1 718322462 454177323 484 May 18 16:04 /lab/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/package.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 718322462 454177323 45 May 18 16:04 /lab/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/.travis.yml
-rw-r--r-- 1 718322462 454177323 1045 May 18 16:04 /lab/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/index.js
-rw-r--r-- 1 718322462 454177323 1101 May 18 16:04 /lab/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/README.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 718322462 454177323 1013 May 18 16:04 /lab/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/test.js

I'd like to ask to fix owner/group for those files (and some other at least under /lab/node_modules/) before-or-at the docker-build, otherwise, you see,

  • everyone will face pull-fail when userns-remap enabled (and ranges specified at subuid/subgid not cover too high IDs),
  • those files would be inaccessible to non-root processes (UPD. Well, they're world-Readable, and their parent dir is everyone-eXecutable).

Also that would agree with a good practice to keep the stuff in order.
TIA!

UPD. I suggest COPY --chown=0:0 <...> at least at https://github.com/memgraph/memgraph-platform/blob/main/Dockerfile#L98 as good enough workaround, if you wish to fix this at docker-build stage instead of at the files origin (where they are copied from).

@katarinasupe
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vpag and thank you for reporting this! This is definitely something we need to fix and thank you for giving us suggestions too. Will keep you posted on the issue. Btw. what are you working on with Memgraph?

@Ariestattoo
Copy link

Hi @katarinasupe This still isn't fixed? Looks like you are using an outdated library that has been superseeded by core as well? I've been tasked with evaluating Memgraph compared to Neo4j and we run unprivileged containers.

@teatreeoilchocolate
Copy link

This is really vexing. This is a rather low hanging fruit and a work-around has been provided. for simply changing one line in a build-pipeline 6 months is really a long time. It is anything but trust inspiring.

@katarinasupe
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @teatreeoilchocolate, I agree with you and apologize for making you wait this long. The happy news is that we are working on something new to make deployment easier for any developer, and that's why we didn't focus on this issue. Does this issue block your work?

@teatreeoilchocolate
Copy link

Not a blocking issue.
After I recovered from being flabbergasted by this ticket, its timeline, the triage of it, the minimal effort(especially considering that the fix is already provided) combined with the big impact and it not moving, the community dev that debugged the problem being ignored and being fed a boiler plate response(would've been ok if it weren't for the garbage-chute) for their effort in combination with throwing this ticket down the garbage-chute, I immediately moved to another graphdb after having penned my disbelieve in the previous response.


And to be clear, this is not entitlement speaking.
I appreciate free software I can run to cut my teeth on to grow. I appreciate the fact that being a dev in a public environment is stressful. I appreciate the minutea of working in a volatile environment with changing and competing priorities. I report bugs in software I use. I sometimes even help to debug them where I can if asked. I have also not a problem with working around bugs and living with the ones I cannot work around.
But this,considering that it was triaged S2-I2(one short of ' the house is burning') last month with it not moving at all(considering that it is low effort) and touching on security in a software that houses data and may at one point even house mine, leaves me speechless.
Especially since the new features must in fact be so awesome and big and heavy, that there was no time to address an issue concerning security for certain setups of users of your software within the last 6 months.

@katarinasupe
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your feedback, @teatreeoilchocolate. It will help us learn how to improve in the future. We recently changed our prioritization system and still have some tweaks to do. We will update the priorities in the community bugs and incremental features project. In the future, if you notice these things and you feel like something is urgent and we should make more effort, or if you have questions, don't hesitate to contact us by booking an office hours call. We are also quite active on Discord to help the community.

@hal-eisen-MG hal-eisen-MG added Priority - Later Priority - Later and removed Priority - Later Priority - Later labels Feb 4, 2024
@hal-eisen-MG hal-eisen-MG added Priority - Later Priority - Later and removed Priority - Later Priority - Later labels Feb 18, 2024
@katarinasupe
Copy link
Contributor

Let's revisit this with the new Memgraph Platform setup cc @MarkoBarisic @gitbuda

@katarinasupe katarinasupe added Frequency - EveryTime Frequency - EveryTime Reach - Most Reach - Most and removed Importance - I2 Importance - I2 labels Feb 27, 2024
@hal-eisen-MG hal-eisen-MG added Priority - Now Priority - Now and removed Priority - Later Priority - Later labels Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug bug Effort - Low Effort - Low Frequency - EveryTime Frequency - EveryTime Priority - Now Priority - Now Reach - Most Reach - Most Severity - S2 Severity - S2
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants