-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Anvi-Profile on .bam files taking long time #1343
Comments
I installed anvio using conda and these instructions: |
Hi ReneKat, Please ignore that eta. It has already been fixed in the master branch. Yes, in the latest version of anvio, anvi-profile is currently much slower than it has to be. If you are use the master branch, you will notice big speed increases with --skip-SNV-profiling. I am currently working on speeding up every aspect of anvi-profile, and so far it is going very well. Once this is finished I think we are planning a release. I won't provide an ETA but certainly within 2 months. Bad timing for your analysis. |
Thank you very much for your timely replies. I have followed instructions at I am rerunning the anvi-profile command on my smallest 21MB .bam file. In the meantime, I am trying to get anvi'o installed on our AWS server to have more computing power than my MacBook Pro. However, with my limited permissions, will only be able to install the official released version, not the git master. Thanks again for your time and efforts! Best, |
Okay, I forgot one very important argument when re-running my .bam file on the master branch: |
Glad it was that fast. I'm actually going to reopen this issue so that it's on our radar. Once profiling is improved substantially I will comment here with the pull request. |
Changes are in master #1362 It's way faster. |
MacOSX 10.14.6 (Mojave)
MacbookPro 16GB
Hello anvio community,
I am analyzing metagenomic samples on my MacBookPro which only has 16GB of RAM.
When I run the anvi-profile command on one of my .bam files the ETA is normally below 5-min.
03 Feb 20 12:31:27 Profiling w/7 threads] 617 of 51410 contigs ⚙ / MEM ☠️ 4.15 GB ETA: 1m11s
However, after 24-hours of runtime had only processed ~4000 of my 51,000 contigs in that particular .bam file.
I have added the following parameters to no avail:
None of these recommended modifications lower the processing time.
Files located here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15WgP20wYTZT5hAkEcqyDK4rN2U3zjBPF?usp=sharing
Thank you for any tips!
René
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: