Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move InvokeGenerator to a centralized function of Meshkit. #541

Closed
Jougan-0 opened this issue Jul 20, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Move InvokeGenerator to a centralized function of Meshkit. #541

Jougan-0 opened this issue Jul 20, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature

Comments

@Jougan-0
Copy link
Contributor

Current Behavior

When we run mesheryctl registry generate we InvokeGenerator directly inside the mesheryctl command rather it should be a centralized function in meshkit that can be reused in server as well.

Desired Behavior

Update meshkit to contain this functionality.

Resources

Alternatives / Additional Context

@Jougan-0 Jougan-0 added the kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature label Jul 20, 2024
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 20, 2024

Thanks for opening this issue. A contributor will be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please review the Layer5 Community Welcome Guide and sure to join the community Slack.

@MUzairS15
Copy link

@Jougan-0 We should reassign this issue.

@Jougan-0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jougan-0 commented Aug 27, 2024

I think Aviral could do it. Thoughts?

@Jougan-0 Jougan-0 self-assigned this Sep 6, 2024
@Jougan-0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jougan-0 commented Sep 6, 2024

I'll complete this PR after adding some recent changes

Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 28, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time label Oct 28, 2024
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 27, 2024

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue/stale Issue has not had any activity for an extended period of time kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants