You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using the Llama 3.2:3b-instruct model and encountered the following error: 'This model's maximum context length is 2048 tokens. However, you requested 2049 tokens (1681 in the messages, 368 in the completion).' I understand this is due to exceeding the token limit, but I'd like to know:
Why does this token limit exist, and is there a technical reason for this specific constraint?
Are there any best practices or techniques for reducing token usage without losing critical context in messages or completions?
Is there an official document or update from the developers regarding this token limit or potential plans to increase it in future versions?
Are there alternative strategies (e.g., chunking, summarization, or other tricks) that others have used effectively with this model in similar scenarios?
Any insights, guidance, or links to documentation would be greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm using the Llama 3.2:3b-instruct model and encountered the following error: 'This model's maximum context length is 2048 tokens. However, you requested 2049 tokens (1681 in the messages, 368 in the completion).' I understand this is due to exceeding the token limit, but I'd like to know:
Why does this token limit exist, and is there a technical reason for this specific constraint?
Are there any best practices or techniques for reducing token usage without losing critical context in messages or completions?
Is there an official document or update from the developers regarding this token limit or potential plans to increase it in future versions?
Are there alternative strategies (e.g., chunking, summarization, or other tricks) that others have used effectively with this model in similar scenarios?
Any insights, guidance, or links to documentation would be greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: