You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently Rencpp is built with support for std::string and/or Qt. This means "the library" is built with this support. Is it possible or desirable to build the parts that depend on std::string or Qt into a separate library to avoid a link dependency or having to build multiple copies of the main library?
So that would mean instead of rencpp.a as a monolith, you'd have rencpp.a as a slightly smaller library with accompanying rencpp-qt.a and rencpp-std.a libs you could build.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently Rencpp is built with support for std::string and/or Qt. This means "the library" is built with this support. Is it possible or desirable to build the parts that depend on std::string or Qt into a separate library to avoid a link dependency or having to build multiple copies of the main library?
So that would mean instead of rencpp.a as a monolith, you'd have rencpp.a as a slightly smaller library with accompanying rencpp-qt.a and rencpp-std.a libs you could build.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: