Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate switchting to FastAPI instead of aiohttp #30

Open
kinnarr opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluate switchting to FastAPI instead of aiohttp #30

kinnarr opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kinnarr
Copy link
Member

kinnarr commented Jan 31, 2023

The core of the wizard was developed in the learning process. Now that I am more experienced I would use FastAPI instead of aiohttp.

Benefits of FastAPI:

  • OpenAPI documentation (swagger) without creating extra yaml files
  • Input validation with pydantic
  • JSON respones as default (just return a pydantic object)
@kinnarr kinnarr added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant