You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many modes share the C-c C-c = commit and C-c C-k = abort idiom. I understand the rationale for C-x C-s and it's fine, it already has its complement in C-x C-q. But C-c C-k doesn't have its counterpart in C-c C-c.
So in order to:
Be consistent with a large part of emacs that uses the C-c C-c/k idiom.
Be internally consistent by providing complete pairs: C-c C-c/k and C-x C-s/q.
I suggest to add C-c C-c.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many modes share the C-c C-c = commit and C-c C-k = abort idiom. I understand the rationale for C-x C-s and it's fine, it already has its complement in C-x C-q. But C-c C-k doesn't have its counterpart in C-c C-c.
So in order to:
I suggest to add C-c C-c.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: