Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TFAR 0.9.11 Server configs are broken #1102

Closed
1im opened this issue Aug 21, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

TFAR 0.9.11 Server configs are broken #1102

1im opened this issue Aug 21, 2016 · 5 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@1im
Copy link

1im commented Aug 21, 2016

Greetings,

Since the 0.9.11 update on 16/08/16 ( withSIX), server configs are ignored by the server, and it doesn't have any effect, no matter if we use bool or 1/0
If executed with bool on init.sqf it works like a charm, hence the functions are clearly intact, so our best guess is that something messed up with how the mod handles userconfigs or may be the folder name should have been different than just task_force_radio, we don't know

This issue is hindering gameplay pretty badly, and we would absolutely scream with joy if you will look into it and figure out what went wrong, anyway, absolutely adore your mod,

Best regards,
Tactical Shift

@zgmrvn
Copy link
Contributor

zgmrvn commented Aug 29, 2016

the userconfig file has been discontinued due to steam "uncompatibility", work around already submitted here : #1099

@dedmen
Copy link
Collaborator

dedmen commented Sep 15, 2016

@zgmrvn are you sure its due to steam "incompatibility" instead of filepatching stuff?
I personally never needed to use the userconfig.

@zgmrvn
Copy link
Contributor

zgmrvn commented Sep 16, 2016

@kavinsky
Copy link
Collaborator

closable by 0.9.12?

@dedmen
Copy link
Collaborator

dedmen commented Sep 20, 2016

solved by #1099 which is in 0.9.12.

@dedmen dedmen closed this as completed Sep 20, 2016
@dedmen dedmen added this to the 0.9.12 milestone Sep 20, 2016
@dedmen dedmen added the bug label Sep 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants