You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we have OpRoundtripTime and InboundOpsProcessingTime to measure the op perf lifecycle (sent from client -> server -> back to client, and processing)
We should synchronize the sampling of these so we can have correlated samples (and probably a single telemetry point for them)
In addition to the overall time and inbound ops processing time, we should measure when the op got back to the delta queue to measure the actual round trip of the ops.
Including the reference sequence number will also tell us and segregate whether the ops roundtrip is delayed by other ops.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#7312 suggests that measuring latency at DeltaManager level ("raw") and at container runtime level (what we have today) would be advantageous to both have accurate numbers, but also to learn where in whole pipeline we have issues. For example, it's pretty clear that many issues that we see with latencies (as measured today) for op processing, and join op processing in particular are due to container runtime pausing op processing
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 8 days of this comment. Thank you for your contributions to Fluid Framework!
Currently we have
OpRoundtripTime
andInboundOpsProcessingTime
to measure the op perf lifecycle (sent from client -> server -> back to client, and processing)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: