-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ci] Appveyor builds failing #5507
Comments
I suspect this is relevant... it looks like these builds are now getting a PyPy version of Python, instead of CPython. From the full logs (link), it seems that the step installing Lines 54 to 55 in dc4794b
is once again causing Python to be "downgraded" from a CPython-based build to a PyPy one 🙃
This is not the first time this has happened. See #5197, #5198. |
@jameslamb Thanks for opening this issue. Is it possible to resolve this issue for example by installing these two packages with |
Maybe! Although that might bring its own environment-resolution issues. I'm not certain how to solve this, haven't had time to investigate it yet. |
This was fixed in #5510. I just accidentally put |
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity since it was closed. To start a new related discussion, open a new issue at https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues including a reference to this. |
Description
For the last 2 days, Appveyor CI jobs have been failing, blocking development on this project.
I've seen these changes on several, totally-unrelated PRs (e.g. #5503, #5504, #5505, #5506), so I'm fairly sure it's related to that job's configuration and not breaking changes on PRs.
Reproducible example
See any recent appveyor jobs, for example this one from #5506: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/guolinke/lightgbm/builds/44872180/job/sxsvo19536lcd058.
Additional Comments
LightGBM is compiling successfully, but with several errors in the Python unit tests.
Haven't investigated much yet, just opening this to track.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: