Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config.json is too generic of a name and results in conflicts with exising software #68

Open
jaholme opened this issue Jun 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
Backlog good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@jaholme
Copy link
Contributor

jaholme commented Jun 3, 2019

Many existing pieces of software already utilize a file named config.json. A less generic name would result in fewer collisions where PSF source has to be manually modified to look for a different name.

@TimMangan
Copy link
Contributor

PsfConfig.json would be a better name.

Although PsfConfig.xml might be an even better implementation. ;)

@dhoehna dhoehna added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Aug 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backlog good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants