No validation while destructuring array in object of definite type

[carino1]

Bug Report

🔎 Search Terms

google
stackoverflow
https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/FAQ#what-is-structural-typing

🕗 Version & Regression Information

This is the behavior in every version I tried, and I reviewed all the FAQ for entries

⏯ Playground Link

[[<!--
A link to a TypeScript Playground "Share" link which shows this behavior

The TypeScript Workbench can be used for more complex setups, try
https://www.typescriptlang.org/dev/bug-workbench/

As a last resort, you can link to a repo, but these will be slower for us to investigate.
-->
Playground link with relevant code](https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?noUncheckedIndexedAccess=true&target=99&noImplicitOverride=false#code/JYOwLgpgTgZghgYwgAgLIE8AqEDOYCS4E8SyA3gFDLXJwD8AXMnlKAObIA+yIArgDb8A3FRoAjRszCsQHbn0EiAvhQoQAHgAcA9lDDIYvEAjDBtIZAFssuMADEjJsyAAUFAJRMM2PIUgkUShpkBHM8ZDE4HAgvG18iAOQAXnJRYOo4JgByAEYsgBo09LFsgCYCoqURItCQcLgoKGTkAG1kXIL28uQAXWrgqAgwXigLIPTqADppyOjCianphqhKiiUgA)](https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?noUncheckedIndexedAccess=true&target=99&noImplicitOverride=false#code/JYOwLgpgTgZghgYwgAgLIE8AqEDOYCS4E8SyA3gFDLXJwD8AXMnlKAObIA+yIArgDb8A3FRoAjRszCsQHbn0EiAvhQoQAHgAcA9lDDIYvEAjDBtIZAFssuMADEjJsyAAUFAJRMM2PIUgkUShpkBHM8ZDE4HAgvG18iAOQAXnJRYOo4JgByAEYsgBo09LFsgCYCoqURItCQcLgoKGTkAG1kXIL28uQAXWrgqAgwXigLIPTqADppyOjCianphqhKiiUgA)

💻 Code

interface MyTestInteface {
    a?: string | null;
    b?: string | null;
}

export function myTestFunction(
): MyTestInteface {
    const base: MyTestInteface = {
        a: '1',
        b: '2',
    };

    const arr = [ '1', '2' ];

    return {
        ...base,
        ...arr
    }
}

🙁 Actual behavior

No typescript error in return statement

🙂 Expected behavior

Array is destructuring in object, that should be MyTestInteface. Expecting an error here

[MartinJohns]

Duplicate of #49667 / #9726.

And the syntax you're using is called "spreading", not destructuring.

[typescript-bot]

This issue has been marked as a 'Duplicate' and has seen no recent activity. It has been automatically closed for house-keeping purposes.