Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SeqTrack] The performance on NFS are lag then paper report #104

Open
chenshihfang opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[SeqTrack] The performance on NFS are lag then paper report #104

chenshihfang opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@chenshihfang
Copy link

Hi,
I have evaluated your raw results on the NFS dataset, and it appears to perform worse than the reported results in the paper, with a difference of approximately -0.8%. Could you please confirm this observation?

image
image

@chenxin-dlut
Copy link
Collaborator

chenxin-dlut commented Jul 3, 2023

Hi, are you using our tracking/analysis_results.py to test? I just retested raw results and the performance are the same as in the paper.

image

@chenshihfang
Copy link
Author

@chenxin-dlut

Hi, I guess the issue might be related to the format conversion of the ground truth.

anno_path = anno_path.replace('.txt', '_pytracking.txt')

image
image

Based on my conversion approach, I have been able to achieve the same performance as reported in other papers. However, SeqTrack is an exception to this. Therefore, I assume you converted it in your own way.

Could you please provide the '_pytracking.txt' data that you converted?

@WenRuiCai
Copy link

Hi, have you solved it? I alse need the 30fps annotation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants