-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Dashboard][Feature request] Turning off extensions should make widget disappear (or something) and not be able to be added #1892
Labels
Area-Extensibility
Related to extensions
Issue-Feature
New feature or request
Priority-1
Resolution-Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Comments
Related but not dupe of #1390 |
Duplicate of #3252 |
We've identified this as a duplicate of another one that already exists. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the the linked issue. Please add your 👍 to the other issue to raise its priority. Thanks for your report! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-Extensibility
Related to extensions
Issue-Feature
New feature or request
Priority-1
Resolution-Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Dev Home version
No response
Windows build number
No response
Other software
No response
Steps to reproduce the bug
Description
widgets shouldn't be present as Dev Home shouldn't 'see' the extension anymore
This is a complicated problem, and unlikely to make it for Build. We want users to know that we know that it's a problem, so we can create a public GitHub issue for it right when we release.
Can we have PM decide on functionality here? (And it's a big enough decision I think it should be documented.) The suggestion in this bug is not inherently correct (even if we decide it's the functionality we want). DevHome knows about these widgets because the extension registered the widgets with the widget platform. It has nothing to do with the extension's communication with the core app.
If you decide to do this, it severely limits third party widgets in the future. You'd be saying "to have a widget in DevHome, you have to write a DevHome extension". You couldn't write your own app and have DevHome display your widget. Obviously made up example, but if we weren't doing our own ADO widgets, ADO could never write a native client that included a widget used in DevHome. They'd HAVE to also write an extension.
Expected result
No response
Actual result
No response
Included System Information
No response
Included Extensions Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: