Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Configurable disk size #112

Closed
tunz opened this issue Oct 7, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Configurable disk size #112

tunz opened this issue Oct 7, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internal-request Requested by internal teams Needs: attention

Comments

@tunz
Copy link
Contributor

tunz commented Oct 7, 2020

Seems like the disk size for fuzzing (/onefuzz) is fixed. (by OS image?)

Even if we change the vm size, the temporary storage is attached to other drive such as F:\ in Windows or /mnt in Linux.

onefuzz@node000009:/onefuzz$ df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev            3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /dev
tmpfs           797M  708K  796M   1% /run
/dev/sda1        29G  3.6G   26G  13% /
tmpfs           3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs           5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
tmpfs           3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sda15      105M  3.6M  101M   4% /boot/efi
/dev/sdb1        74G   53M   70G   1% /mnt
tmpfs           797M     0  797M   0% /run/user/998
tmpfs           797M     0  797M   0% /run/user/1000

#8 might be a solution. I'm not sure if there's an easier way to achieve this.

AB#39994760

@bmc-msft
Copy link
Contributor

bmc-msft commented Oct 7, 2020

The in-progress effort to support non-azure VMs for fuzzing will enable the work required to resolve #8. Once #8 is resolved, it should be straight forward to enable configurable working directories for Azure VM nodes (such as F:\ or /mnt as this issue indicated).

@stishkin
Copy link
Contributor

@tunz do you still need this feature ?

@tunz
Copy link
Contributor Author

tunz commented Jul 14, 2022

not sure. we needed this feature to move to onefuzz. but, we ended up using our own infra, and we don't have any plan to move to onefuzz in the near future afaik.

@stishkin
Copy link
Contributor

stishkin commented Feb 1, 2023

Out of scope for near future

@stishkin stishkin closed this as completed Feb 1, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internal-request Requested by internal teams Needs: attention
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants