You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your great work. Recently, I was reproducing your experiments. The best result I got, for now, is just 96.5. But in your paper, the result on the Campus dataset you report was 96.7 in PCP.
So I was wondering which config you use to produce this result?
Thanks for your reply in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your great work. Recently, I was reproducing your experiments. The best result I got, for now, is just 96.5. But in your paper, the result on the Campus dataset you report was 96.7 in PCP.
So I was wondering which config you use to produce this result?
Thanks for your reply in advance.
Excuse me, I would like to ask you, what is your training setting for the Campus dataset, because the best result I got is just 90.6(average), maybe you can paste the campus config settings you used for training to me ?
Hello @Mosh-Wang@liqikai9 ,
I am trying to reproduce the results on campus dataset by using the Panoptic backbone ResNet model. Do you have a separate backbone model for campus?
When I ran the panoptic backbone model along with the campus dataset pre-trained model, there is a size mismatch.
Kindly let me know regarding this.
Thank you for your time.
Thanks for your great work. Recently, I was reproducing your experiments. The best result I got, for now, is just 96.5. But in your paper, the result on the Campus dataset you report was 96.7 in PCP.
So I was wondering which config you use to produce this result?
Thanks for your reply in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: