-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Find in all files should sort by priority #19939
Comments
@bpasero Without comment, I'm not sure why the dislike. This provides the following benefits which have been requested separately:
It seems it would be useful that a user could then choose sorting priority method such as:
|
Not much to comment here other than I like our current sorting (strictly alphabetical to workspace context) and I would not benefit from any other sorting. It is the same sorting I have in the explorer and in git changes view. For me search results are about being complete, not about things like recency. If I do a search I expect the order to be according to file/folder sorting rules. This is much different in quick open for files where I want the last used file to be first. |
Ahh thanks. I actually did not understand how it is currently sorted. In a project with thousands of folders, the results don't seem to have an order, but now I do see the pattern. For me there are 2 general search cases:
As an alternative, some type of method to more quickly apply scoping could also work for my use case. I haven't found folder organization usually important, but that could be due to my projects folder structure which is too large and deep to be useful in the results view. |
This feature request will not be considered in the next 6-12 months roadmap and as such will be closed to keep the number of issues we have to maintain actionable. Thanks for understanding and happy coding! |
Find in all files should sort using the following priority by default:
Brackets all file search for example does a sorting similar to the above which is very useful.
There should be a button to also do an alphabetical sort.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: