Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make a non azure referance implementation #204

Open
NicTanghe opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

make a non azure referance implementation #204

NicTanghe opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work.

Comments

@NicTanghe
Copy link

NicTanghe commented Apr 12, 2023

Simplify and homogenize selfhosing

The whole point of winget is to simplify and homogenize the process of packages in windows.
having it rely on azure is counter productive.

should be as simple as installing (either via winget or flathub) and putting the manifest in a location.
Not making ppl feel smart about jumping trough meaningless hoops and venderlocking.

@NicTanghe NicTanghe added the Issue-Docs Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 12, 2023
@NicTanghe NicTanghe changed the title make a nin azure referance implementation make a non azure referance implementation Apr 12, 2023
@thilojaeggi
Copy link

https://github.com/thilojaeggi/WinGetty is an alternative to this and can be self-hosted as well and doesn't need any cloud dependency.

@mherrmann
Copy link

Same for https://winget.pro, which also has a hosted option.

@RDMacLachlan
Copy link
Member

Appreciate the feedback on this @NicTanghe . I would really like to hear more about how you would want to use this in an offline way.

@w0
Copy link

w0 commented Nov 29, 2023

Appreciate the feedback on this @NicTanghe . I would really like to hear more about how you would want to use this in an offline way.

@RDMacLachlan I think like me, they want a way to host this with on-prem infrastructure. My org isn't using azure (or other providers) and a request for azure resources would most likely be denied.

@mherrmann
Copy link

@w0 have you had a look at https://winget.pro as a non-Azure option?

@RDMacLachlan RDMacLachlan added Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. and removed Issue-Docs Improvements or additions to documentation labels Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants