You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
jitpack is convenient for library authors but inconvenient for consumers (especially those at large organizations with requirements about artifact hosting).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I signed up at sonatype and played around with registering namespaces.
This library uses package com.hoho.android.usbserial for the Java classes.
Do namespaces and package name have to be identical?
As I am not the original author of this library I do not have DNS write access to hoho.com and no full write access to this project, e.g. I cannot store github secrets in this project which are very likely needed for automated integration. Might need involvement of the original author @mik3y
In this case the Java package name can stay com.hoho but the coordinate of the artifact has to change to io.github.mik3y.
If you want automatic publishing of the releases then - yes, it will require installing secrets.
Having only one admin user looks to me a big risk; delegating the admin permissions to at least one more person might be a good idea. What do you think, @mik3y ?
Any chance you could support this?
jitpack is convenient for library authors but inconvenient for consumers (especially those at large organizations with requirements about artifact hosting).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: