-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invalid coloring in some specific cases #109
Comments
Probably need a separate rule that checks for a specific warning pattern. Something that matches |
Well it works perfectly for other lines with the same pattern that do not contain the word succeeded so I guess the problem is that the string contains both warning and succeeded and the success color takes precedence. IMHO it should be that warnings have precedence. Here is probably more obvious example: |
You do know you can edit the regex's for pattern matching, right? Maybe you could try altering the regex's to get the desired result (IMHO)... |
Yeah, I know and I can confirm that just by reordering the original patterns this issue can be fixed. I reported it because I think it should be so by default so people like me who filter the output by color when quickly looking at it are not misled. But that's just my opinion... |
Agreed. Just needed to know if that fixed your issue. So I assume just bumping it up one level fixed it. I'll add this to a new release soon. |
Actually had to do something more as the warning regex that needed to be moved up was the maybe second or third lowest. I don't really remember and there's no Reset to default button but maybe all the warning regexes should be higher than the success ones? |
I'm getting some wrongly-colored lines in my output on lines such as this:
It's a warning message but probably because it contains the string succeeded it gets colored to the green success-color instead of warning yellow color.
I think warning should have precedence over success maybe every time or it should be checked by what appears earlier in the string?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: