Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverse dependency check failure #93

Closed
teunbrand opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Reverse dependency check failure #93

teunbrand opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@teunbrand
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Mitchell,

We have been preparing a new release of ggplot2 and during a reverse dependency check, it became apparent that the prospective ggplot2 3.5.0 would break distributional.

Now I noticed some activity, e.g. 4d6eb3f that would suggest that this becomes a non-issue some time in the future. As ggplot2 aims to release 3.5.0 on the 12th of February, I'm mostly inquiring about whether distributional plans on detaching from ggplot2 before or after that date (if my assumption to detach is correct). If the answer is 'after', then I'm more than happy to put in a PR for a (temporary) fix. If the answer is 'before', then I guess this doesn't really matter.

Would you please let me know what your plans are and if I can be of any help making distributional compatible with ggplot2 3.5.0?

To test the code changes with the release candidate, you can install it with the code below:

remotes::install_github("tidyverse/ggplot2", ref = remotes::github_pull("5592"))

The progress of the release can be tracked in tidyverse/ggplot2#5588.

@teunbrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is just a kind reminder that the release is scheduled soon. If you'd like any help, please let me know.

@mitchelloharawild
Copy link
Owner

The package has been updated on CRAN and should now be compatible with ggplot2 3.5.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants