-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DellEMC: No script is provided to run ssd-small #11
Comments
If I were to guess, this
|
Guessing further, SSD-Small in the Offline scenario and Performance mode would use offline_ssdm.sh:
|
To investigate a bit further, I've also decided to take a look at the |
Curiously, neither the
nor the
match the Dell systems well considering their respective Offline scores:
It's probably fine for the Offline mode, but could have led to suboptimal scores in the Server mode (not reported). |
It's also peculiar that while the Offline score (inputs/second) is better (higher) for |
(Aside: It's a pity that no pricing is suggested for |
(Aside again: But for the best CPU for which pricing is available, |
(Yet another aside: In the preview category, Tencent used four |
Please ignore all comments regarding '8280', that was a mistake in the comment. The Tencent SKU is a custom SKU so it is not reported on the Intel website. |
Thanks @christ1ne. I had to look up SKU in Wikipedia (and donate £5 for its upkeep!) The comment is wrong, but so is |
My understanding is that you just need to set a number which is a reasonable for your HW. The final reported performance numbers will be from the logs. |
The README for SSD-Small using OpenVINO in the DellEMC submission, says:
This folder, however, contains two files:
(which is neither
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz
norIntel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8276 CPU @ 2.20GHz
that Dell EMC used in their submission.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: