Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
Note @dsp-ant commented elsewhere:
I FULLY agree with this. The intent is to create a neutral space for contributors. I use the others as models to describe the successful parts of vendor neutrality and open foundations for protocols and tooling advancing the state. The references I'm using are just that, and not a guide or suggestion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It seems like there's a lot of interest in this! As I've done this work before, I am gathering people in a new Discord for something, hopefully like the Bytecode Alliance, I'm right now dubbing the Agentic Alliance. It could be a collaborative place - really the flow should BE that there is a foundation, and it is appealing for Anthropic to donate the project to the community foundation, they may submit it for review. I'll keep this open to continue the discussion because I am deeply interested in this! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Pre-submission Checklist
Your Idea
MCP is exciting. There is a lot of momentum around it, and it's because it's a very clean abstraction for identifying the control flows and action ownership of different actors in an agentic system.
Having seen the growth of projects across the Bytecode Alliance, ASF, CNCF, LF, and OpenSSF, I think this MCP is an excellent opportunity to start working on open governance. A significant theme of open source software in the past years, from foundations to software licensing, has been about vendor lock-in and ownership. In fact, multi-vendor collaboration can often be a requirement for usage in some enterprises or in secure systems, and healthy ecosystem. There is documentation as well around https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3377811.3380376 of competitors in collaborative open source ecosystems.
I am an emeritus lead/bootstrap chair of CNCF TAG Contributor Strategy which focuses on these types of issues: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/template-graduation-application.md#contributors-and-community.
I'd love to kick the discussion off as this is a roadmap item for the MCP team. I have no proposals for now. I would note there's many possible structures, and in general I believe that the Bytecode Alliance structure (or even more lightweight) would be a good way for many to participate and grow MCP (even if it's early but growing fast). Tooling, protocols, standards, and open research/working groups for agentic systems.
Thanks so much for being open to this.
Scope
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions