Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I understand the concern. I'd love to expand the protocol based on very specific use-cases where the current implementation causes a lot of pain. If you have specific problems with the current implementations, let us know. We internally found the current representation good enough in nearly all cases, which of course doesn't mean there aren't any usecases. Would just love to make it specific rather than theoretical. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It looks like having the Client support completions https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/server/utilities/completion/ would help here - perhaps if there were a way to indicate that completions should be preferred for population? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As I was reading the spec as it relates to prompts I was curious on what types of arguments could be utilized for prompts. The example in the spec only shows a string argument type but it seems like would be useful to support other types of arguments. For example a
string[]
. I propose that we add some way to indicate onPromptArgument
what the argument type is. This could start with just astring
type for now but would allow for supporting other types in the future e.g.string[]
.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions