Add default postcode comparison function

[samnlindsay]

Generate a case expression with 3-5 levels:

CASE 
WHEN {full_match} THEN 4
WHEN {sector_match} THEN 3
WHEN {district_match} THEN 2
WHEN {area_match} THEN 1
ELSE 0 
END

[mamonu]

would something like this work or does this need to be fully in SQL format?

def PCmatch(pc_l, pc_r):
    count = 0
    while count < len(pc_l):
        if pc_l[count] == pc_r[count]:
            count += 1
        else:
            break
    return count

[RobinL]

Yeah, needs to be in the form of a SQL case expression

[mamonu]

have a look on Slack for a ScalaUDF solution. Or is there an easier way and I am overcomplicating things?

[pbhj]

Is that too naive? Wouldn't it be better to convert to a more general geographic indicator (rather than a postal area), like lat/lon, and then compare? With this sort of comparison you might have moved one street but have an entirely different postcode?

There must be a lot of solutions to this already with UK gov codebases.

[RobinL]

We have support for distance as the crow flies using lat and long input columns (not yet in the pypi version, will land in the next release):

splink/splink/comparison_level_library.py

Line 228 in d80b0c7

def distance_in_km_level(

It can just sometimes be a bit of a faff to join on the geolocation to the input data, so this would provide a quick and dirty solution that would get 80% of the way there

[RossKen]

Could build ontop of #1190

[RossKen]

Closed by #1230