Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance against large Table Storage collection #3

Open
claytonrothschild opened this issue Feb 19, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Performance against large Table Storage collection #3

claytonrothschild opened this issue Feb 19, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@claytonrothschild
Copy link

We are having trouble getting this library to perform against a Table Storage collection that has about 2 million records in it. Each record is approximately 4KB.

For example, a simple SELECT LIMIT 10 statement is timing out on a 7 node HDInsight cluster. Has anyone tried using this library yet, and if so, are you having similar results? Perhaps we are not using it properly.

Thanks and regards,
Clayton

@caserzer
Copy link

I think the performance issue relative to get all partition in the DefaultTablePartitioner.java. maybe you should rewrite the code depend on the partition logic of your own table.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants