Missing ARM 64 docker image

[kaplan-shaked]

Watchman Version: latest

What were you trying to do?
Trying to run moov/watchman docker image on ARM64 Kubernetes node

[marlapativ]

@adamdecaf I'd like to work on this issue.

Could you help me out with what all architectures that you'd like to support?
And I'd be using a docker buildx if that's fine?

[adamdecaf]

Yea go for it. We need binaries for ARM as well. Windows,Mac,Linux amd64 and ARM

[marlapativ]

@adamdecaf
some more questions:

Can I update the current docker release pipeline(github action) to use docker build-push-action?
https://github.com/docker/build-push-action

It also has support to push to multiple registries
https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/push-multi-registries/

This would mean that commands in makefile would no longer be used in the current release pipeline.

[adamdecaf]

Yea. I like having the docker commands in makefiles so they can be tested locally, but if those actions are simple we can try them.

[marlapativ]

@adamdecaf, I'm sorry for taking sometime to analyze.
Couple more questions:

1. From what I see in the code, make docker-openshift(docker image created using Dockerfile-openshift) pushes the image only to quay.io which.
   Technically quay.io contains your custom openshift usage although dockerhub contains the official Dockerfile image.
   Is that correct?

2. Do the following images also have to be release in multiple architectures:

• Dockerfile (make docker-hub)
• Dockerfile-static (make docker-static)
• Dockerfile-openshift (make docker-openshift)
• cmd/watchmantest/Dockerfile(make docker-watchmantest)

3. The following architectures are supported. Should I add all?
   x86-64 (linux/amd64, linux/i386)
   ARM architectures (linux/arm/v5, linux/arm/v6, linux/arm/v7, linux/arm64)

The popular being: linux/amd64, linux/arm/v7, linux/arm64
Is it okay if I support only these 3?