-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add finalResponseHeadersStart
to resource timing
#1108
Comments
I think it's @Bas-moz |
We have no objection on this, it should be a |
@bvandersloot-mozilla can you review the privacy implications for this? Thanks. |
RE Privacy: network caches are already partitioned, so there is no increased risk for cache fingerprinting of 3p tracking. The privacy considerations are correct in that respect. Further, gating on The remaining question is, should we be worried about the increased fidelity on resource timing from a first party? This may give a clearer network latency measurement from the client to the server, but I don't believe this is anything they couldn't piece together from existing data available to them, and is probably weaker than other networking fingerprints. My verdict is that this is r+ on the privacy side. |
Request for Mozilla Position on an Emerging Web Specification
@
-mention GitHub accounts): @noamr @tunethewebOther information
This was resolved in the WebPerfWG meeting, see minutes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: