Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WICG Media APIs #182

Closed
marcoscaceres opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

WICG Media APIs #182

marcoscaceres opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
venue: W3C CG Specifications in W3C Community Groups (e.g., WICG, Privacy CG) venue: W3C Specifications in W3C Working Groups

Comments

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor

marcoscaceres commented Jul 9, 2019

The following media-related APIs are in the final stages of being migrated to the newly rechartered W3C Media Working Group - the proposals have been incubating for a few years, and Media WG (co-chaired by Apple and Google), intend to formally standardize... I'm assuming that Apple's involvement means there is a moderate chance some of these APIs will be implemented in WebKit (maybe some have already?). They are all shipping in Chrome I believe. Apart from our loosely formed opinion on Picture-in-Picture (#72), I'm unsure about our plans for others:

CC @padenot and @jyavenard, as members of the working group, and @mikeconley re: PiP.

If there are any concerns about them migrating or we believe some need further incubation, it would be a good time to speak up. Similarly, it would be good to express some position for these specs.

The WICG Chairs will be reviewing the intents to migrate, linked to above, over this week with the aim of migrating them by next week.

@annevk annevk added venue: W3C Specifications in W3C Working Groups venue: W3C CG Specifications in W3C Community Groups (e.g., WICG, Privacy CG) labels Jul 10, 2019
@padenot
Copy link
Collaborator

padenot commented Jul 10, 2019

Picture in Picture: we're following the spec but don't plan to currently implement the API.
Media Capabilities: we implement and ship the spec, and we're currently implementing and intend to ship additions to the spec.
Media Session: we don't implement, but we are considering implementing and shipping in in the short to medium term. In particular, we're currently doing experiments to support this effort at the platform level.
Media Playback Quality: we implement and ship this spec, and intend to continue doing so, were it to change.
Autoplay Policy Detection: we are actively participating to the spec discussion, and plan to implement and ship the outcome of this discussion.

I'll write something to formally express our position.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor Author

@padenot, @annevk, in the intent to migrate for media playback quality, @domenic raised a concern about where standardization should happen: Media WG or WHATWG? Might be good to chime in there too.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing, as we now have separate issues for each.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
venue: W3C CG Specifications in W3C Community Groups (e.g., WICG, Privacy CG) venue: W3C Specifications in W3C Working Groups
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants