Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Standardise on one syntax for nullable types #1620

Open
jgraham opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Standardise on one syntax for nullable types #1620

jgraham opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jgraham
Copy link
Member

jgraham commented Nov 23, 2022

We currently use a mixture of Foo | None and Optional[Foo]. It would be good to pick one or the other. Personally I find Optional a little easier to read than the inline-union approach, but I don't have a very strong opinion.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jgraham