You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In your paper, the mask of each layer is generated by a sigmoid with its value initialized as 0.5. However, the mask is doubled with 1.0 as initial value in this implementation. Could you explain the mismatch between the code and the paper? Or, could you release the results of 1x mask and 2x mask? Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My guess is that the normal mask for every sample point should be 1. However, the sigmoid function is 0.5 in zero. Thus it is required to be doubled to become 1.
In your paper, the mask of each layer is generated by a sigmoid with its value initialized as 0.5. However, the mask is doubled with 1.0 as initial value in this implementation. Could you explain the mismatch between the code and the paper? Or, could you release the results of 1x mask and 2x mask? Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: