We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
I could not reproduce the deeplab baseline on cityscapes. The baseline is getting ~66% lower than 70.4% in the paper.
I found there is cropping in this repo, https://github.com/msracver/Deformable-ConvNets/blob/master/experiments/deeplab/cfgs/deeplab_resnet_v1_101_cityscapes_segmentation_base.yaml#L60) But, in the paper, it seems to use the whole image as input in training time.
In addition, the learning rate is different. (5e-4 (https://github.com/msracver/Deformable-ConvNets/blob/master/experiments/deeplab/cfgs/deeplab_resnet_v1_101_cityscapes_segmentation_base.yaml#L52) vs 1e-3 in the paper)
Could you please specify the differences between this repo and the paper?
And is it possible to reproduce the number of the deeplab baseline with the same configuration of this repo?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
I could not reproduce the deeplab baseline on cityscapes. The baseline is getting ~66% lower than 70.4% in the paper.
I found there is cropping in this repo, https://github.com/msracver/Deformable-ConvNets/blob/master/experiments/deeplab/cfgs/deeplab_resnet_v1_101_cityscapes_segmentation_base.yaml#L60)
But, in the paper, it seems to use the whole image as input in training time.
In addition, the learning rate is different. (5e-4 (https://github.com/msracver/Deformable-ConvNets/blob/master/experiments/deeplab/cfgs/deeplab_resnet_v1_101_cityscapes_segmentation_base.yaml#L52) vs 1e-3 in the paper)
Could you please specify the differences between this repo and the paper?
And is it possible to reproduce the number of the deeplab baseline with the same configuration of this repo?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: