You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're considering building DTLS transports in libp2p/libp2p#49. Therefore, I suggest to add a 'dtls' multiaddr protocol. I'd like to have some input on the following:
We don't really need a 'value' part of the multiaddr to establish a connection. However, we could add a certificate fingerprint as a form of authentication. Is this a good use of the 'value'? Can this be made optional?
Should I open a PR on this, the multicodec or both repo's?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're considering building DTLS transports in libp2p/libp2p#49. Therefore, I suggest to add a 'dtls' multiaddr protocol. I'd like to have some input on the following:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: