-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question for ip-mptcp command #502
Comments
Hello,
Just to know what you expect, can each address reaches any address of the other peer? e.g. Or here you can only have max 2 subflows in this setup?
Mmh,
So here, I would expect the kernel not to create any additional subflows, except if the server sends an FYI, the Maybe this update of the website could help better understanding how to use the PM works?
The
To be honest, I'm not sure how you ended up with 2 subflows with what you described: even in the 'monitor' output, I don't see any received
Was it even announcing the endpoint before? Can you try with the
When a
Again, best to retry with the proper flags.
For more details: https://www.mptcp.dev/debugging.html#ss |
I have a server-client connected with two interfaces.
-----client---------------------server---
10.10.10.2 <----------> 10.10.10.3
20.20.20.2 <----------> 20.20.20.3
client side mptcp config
server side mptcp config
When I connect the client to the server it creates 2 subflows (one is the initial subflow)
Question:
I delete the endpoint from the client side.
This removes the subflow from client and server (remove address command)
Now I added the endpoint again to the client.
But the server won't signal its second interface address
20.20.20.3
to create a new subflow. Is it the correct behaviour?If I understand correctly, the server announces its address only once when the MPTCP connection is established and will not announce it again. Is that correct?
Here is the output from ip mptcp monitor
As you can see, after the
SF_CLOSED
there is noSF_ESTABLISHED
Also, I wonder why the
ss
command only shows the initial subflow. It never shows the second subflow.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: