Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Cite this" page button #1823

Closed
confirmordeny opened this issue Aug 31, 2014 · 10 comments
Closed

"Cite this" page button #1823

confirmordeny opened this issue Aug 31, 2014 · 10 comments

Comments

@confirmordeny
Copy link
Collaborator

WhatDoTheyKnow contains thousands of documents many of which are not available elsewhere online. Researchers may want to cite these in papers. We should make this as easy as possible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Cite&page=Neutron&id=623346964

@garethrees
Copy link
Member

Worth looking at during/after #1523

@crowbot crowbot added 0 - backlog and removed bug Breaks expected functionality labels Sep 21, 2017
@garethrees garethrees added enhancement Adds new functionality f:request-analysis labels May 29, 2018
@garethrees
Copy link
Member

Nice pattern for this on The Journal of Design and Science:

Screenshot 2021-01-13 at 11 51 58

Screenshot 2021-01-13 at 11 52 21

@gbp
Copy link
Member

gbp commented Aug 20, 2021

Github has recently added a button like this: https://github.blog/2021-08-19-enhanced-support-citations-github/

@garethrees
Copy link
Member

Nice clear "How to cite" section of this journal article.

Screenshot 2022-04-19 at 13 12 19

@WilliamWDTK
Copy link
Collaborator

A perhaps useful tool for citations could be citation.js (I believe it's client-side). There's a demo on the website. We would have to come up with appropriate mappings for each field. It can parse BibJSON through a plug-in.

There's also an article from the ALA (archived version) on a similar topic.

@WilliamWDTK
Copy link
Collaborator

I also started wondering whether mySociety or Alaveteli could assign DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers), since I'd imagine they'd potentially be applicable to some of the output. It seems like you have to pay, but I'd noted down the following links:

@WilliamWDTK
Copy link
Collaborator

We could also use the citation generation page/box/whatever to encourage adding a citation from the Alavateli platform concerned (e.g. WDTK) to the work citing the request. Attempting to make a circle of citation, of sorts.

@WilliamWDTK
Copy link
Collaborator

And I'm not sure whether it's worth separating (or even considering) the suggestion I had of facilitating Re-use of Public Sector Information requests by those other than the original requester. Or whether people should just make their own FOI requests…

@garethrees
Copy link
Member

Nice example of "cite this" for datasets:

Screenshot 2024-03-05 at 09 54 44

@garethrees
Copy link
Member

This is desirable, but unlikely to be worked on in the next 12 months so closing for now.

@garethrees garethrees closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants