-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
feat: import_verifiable_stream
and write_verifiable_stream
in Store
#10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I still requested a review just to confirm: Is this a feature we want to support in |
Documentation for this PR has been generated and is available at: https://n0-computer.github.io/iroh-blobs/pr/10/docs/iroh_blobs/ Last updated: 2025-01-03T14:55:42Z |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find it a bit weird that this is defined on MapEntry.
Wouldn't it be better to have this as a store fn that uses MapEntry? MapEntry really does everything it needs to do.
Also, it would be cool if we could make this more generic, otherwise we will have a dozen methods for special cases, like in this case streaming from offset..end of the file.
fn import_verifiable_stream<'a>( | ||
&'a self, | ||
hash: Hash, | ||
total_size: u64, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where does the total_size come from? Is it a verified size?
write_verifiable_stream seems identical to https://docs.rs/iroh-blobs/latest/iroh_blobs/provider/fn.send_blob.html except that send_blob is more generic. |
Quick update on this: there are going to be a lot of changes to the store before 1.0. I am not happy with the current trait hierarchy at all. But this functionality will exist in some way in the new api. |
That's perfect. I'm happy to change iroh-willow to use any eqivalent new abstractions once they're in (doesn't have to be this PR). |
Basically I want to get rid of the entire trait hierarchy and replace it with a "protocol" that you use to talk to the store. There will be 2 protocol calls ImportBao and ExportBao, and these will then be wrapped in a pleasant way by an API that sits in front of the protocol. This is the bao impex part of the protocol: /// Export the given sizes in bao format, with the iroh block size.
///
/// The returned stream should be verified by the store.
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct ExportBao {
pub hash: Hash,
pub ranges: ChunkRanges,
pub out: mpsc::Sender<EncodedItem>,
}
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct ImportBao {
pub hash: Hash,
pub size: u64,
pub data: mpsc::Receiver<BaoContentItem>,
pub out: oneshot::Sender<anyhow::Result<()>>,
} And this is how it will be exposed in the "pleasant" API: pub async fn import_bao_quinn(
&self,
hash: Hash,
ranges: ChunkRanges,
stream: &mut quinn::RecvStream,
) -> anyhow::Result<()> { ... }
pub async fn import_bao_bytes(
&self,
hash: Hash,
ranges: ChunkRanges,
data: Bytes,
) -> anyhow::Result<()> { ... } |
Closing. Will keep track of this in #61 |
Description
Store::import_verifiable_stream
MapEntry::write_verifiable_stream
These allow interacting with the
iroh_blobs
store using iroh's bao-style streams.I'm coming across this while extracting
iroh-willow
into its own thing. This means merging in all work that's not yet merged into iroh yet from thewillow
PR/branch in iroh. This is one of these things.IIUC, this allows us to stream the willow entry payloads directly from the WGPS protocol instead of having to simultaneously run iroh-blobs & iroh-willow.
Breaking Changes
Adding fn to traits should be non-breaking as long as they have default impls, right?
Notes & Open Questions
Unfortunately no tests with this yet, other than my pinky-promise that this code has worked so far for iroh-willow.
That said, I haven't tried bigger payloads yet.
I'll probably make use of this branch for the iroh-willow extraction and come back eventually to add proper tests.
Change checklist