Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Starting Time Argument #318

Closed
gleasonj-lm opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Starting Time Argument #318

gleasonj-lm opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gleasonj-lm
Copy link

I would like to be able to specify a starting time, or an offset, to the oceanwaters simulation to accommodate for different shadow conditions created at different points in Europa's orbit around Jupiter. Ideally, I would like to be able to specify this starting time as an argument to a launch file like I might specify use_rviz. However I am not sure that arguments are allowed in the world files. Currently we use a bash script to alter the sim time in the desired world file and then launch.

Is adding a command-line style argument to augment the starting simulation time possible?

@mogumbo
Copy link
Contributor

mogumbo commented Feb 10, 2023

I was about to reply that this is not possible with Gazebo. However, this feature was just added: gazebosim/gazebo-classic#3294 I haven't tried it myself. Also, this is now in the gazebo11 branch but there probably hasn't been a new release of gazebo11 in the past week. In the short term if you want to use it you will need to compile gazebo yourself.

@kmdalal kmdalal self-assigned this Jul 27, 2023
@kmdalal
Copy link
Contributor

kmdalal commented Jul 29, 2023

@gleasonj-lm , this is an old issue and I'm wondering if you've found a solution or workaround? Did you try the gazebo11 suggestion in the previous comment?

@kmdalal
Copy link
Contributor

kmdalal commented Oct 4, 2023

Closing this issue because it's so old. I have captured it in our internal Jira OCEANWATER-1213. Please re-request if this is still needed.

@kmdalal kmdalal closed this as completed Oct 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants