-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cropland: Mali-National Level 2019 #239
Comments
@cnakalembe what year? |
Preference is 2022 since the season is done
… On Nov 12, 2022, at 10:45 AM, Ivan Zvonkov ***@***.***> wrote:
@cnakalembe what year?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
|
Context: When we randomly sample points for evaluation on CEO, 1% or less of the sample may be crop Issue: Low crop sample size make evaluation difficult Potential solution:
|
From the literature review on stratification techniques, I summarized some of the methods used in the papers listed in the Google Doc -- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QfBemFjJtRUJ3C8Z70tszGlNZo5iB50knRK0y6iusqk/edit Happy to hear your comments! |
Read through the report in some more detail, great summaries! |
Context: NDVI by stratification is the easiest and most intuitive way of sampling random points Issue: Low crop sample size makes evaluation difficult Potential solution:
|
Changing year to 2019 |
@ivanzvonkov, @hannah-rae, I tried the NDVI by quartiles. What do you think? Also adding the GEE code - https://code.earthengine.google.com/0d6758d51ef68a4bbdb881d11edd1eb3 |
@MsPixels okay took a look at this in some more detail couple questions:
After clarification of these questions the next step is to figure out how many points to sample. The Olofsson paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0034425714000704 is one resource for this. Once you have that number we can figure out how to create a Collect Earth Online labeling set from these points. |
|
Okay I see. So given:
As I understand your suggestion is:
But these are not true quartiles, right?
This can be plotted with: var NDVI_threshold = ee.Image(1)
.where(clip.gte(ee.Number(percentiles.get("NDVI_p25"))), 2)
.where(clip.gte(ee.Number(percentiles.get("NDVI_p50"))), 3)
.where(clip.gte(ee.Number(percentiles.get("NDVI_p75"))), 4)
; Would this make more sense as a stratification? What are the pros and cons of your suggested ranges? |
I chose the 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles based on this article I found Long-Term_Land_UseLand_Cover_Change_Assessment_of_the_Kilombero_Catchment_in_Tanzania. I will go ahead and use the quartiles you suggested. |
Also, after going through Olofsson's paper, I came up with this sampling design for three scenarios based on the standard error of the overall accuracy. Will be on standby for your comments. Sampling Design for Mali |
Stratification by LULC. This code combines 11 LULC layers to get a majority vote of crop and noncrop zones. Based on the strata, I sampled the crop and noncrop points. |
Month: Feb
Year: 2019
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: