-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nak() should follow backoff #5856
Comments
You can however specify |
@Jarema that seems to contradict the info in the official docs, which for
Can you clarify on how and when this option is supposed to work? I've spent some time trying to get it work without success until I've noticed this thread, so my understanding is that you are right and the docs are wrong. This however seem a little bit counterintuitive, as I can't see a reason why this should not be applied to |
Docs are wrong - it is redelivery of acknowledgement timeouts. |
I see. Thanks for a quick reply. For anyone interested, you can use |
Proposed change
Make
msg.nak()
follow the set backoff strategy in the consumer.Use case
Given the following:
I would expect
msg.nak()
to make use of the backoff strategy. However backoff is only used for retries.Contribution
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: